It is in words, signs and symbols.
It is in the Bible.
It is in the version you read.
If we, as believers, all agree that God exists and the Bible is His Word, then we must ask this very sincere question, “Can God make a mistake?”
We all know, as believers, what the answer is.
We must now extend this thought.
If the Bible is God’s Word, then it, too, cannot have any mistakes.
The problem is, if this is so, why are there so many different translations and why do they all not concur with each other?
The answer is simple.
There is only one Word of God.
It was given to us by the Holy Spirit.
The same Holy Spirit who cannot, as God, make a mistake.
He gave it to us from the beginning; it is error-free.
So why are there so many versions of the Scriptures?
When did a new interpretation of the Bible first appear?
It was not until the advent of the printing press and, then, in the 1500s when protest-ant idiots began to tamper with the Scriptures translating it into the “vernacular.”
It began by first removing seven books from the Bible. It was not an accident. The protest-ant “reformers” did not like these books. They are now referred to in protest-ant land as “apocrypha.”
Funny, they weren’t apocrypha to the early Christians.
Nor to the Saints, whether in the Eastern or Western empire of the Church.
In fact, if Martin Luther had his way, there would be a few other books missing in the protest-ant Bible and slated to the “apocrypha” heap. There would be today no Epistle of James; no book of “Revelation.”
Luther called the letter of the Apostle James an “epistle of straw.” Can you imagine facing God on the day of your death and being reminded that you called one of the books in His Word “straw”?
Luther also thought that the Book of Apocalypse — Revelation in protest-ant land — was too full of imagery and symbolism; no one would ever be able to interpret it. Therefore, it wasn’t worthy, according to this “sola scriptura” “pope,” of being part of Scripture.
We think the Bible has something to say about those who would dare tamper with Scripture — whether Catholic, protest-ant or you name it!
“I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book.
If anyone shall add to them, God will add unto
him the plagues that are written in this book.
And if anyone shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy,
God will take away his portion from the tree of life,
and from the Holy City,
and from the things that are written in this book.”
Apocalypse 22:18-19.
Those are pretty strong words from God.
Yet, Luther did not consider them worthy of his version of the Scriptures.
Today, we have protest-ants who think they know the Scriptures, although they only have 66 books in their Bibles.
What happened to the other seven?
When were they taken out and why?
They were taken out during the “reformation” by people called Luther, Knox, Calvin, and Zwingli.
They were following the yeast of the Pharisees, the very men God warned us not to follow. The seven books we speak of were originally taken out by the Pharisees from the Hebrew Scriptures in 90 A.D., 20 years after the prophecy of the Temple’s destruction came to pass.
These were men who did not like Christianity, its God, nor the Woman who bore Him.
The early Christians, without going into great detail, canonized 73 books after the Church came out of the underground. Unlike Luther and his followers, they followed Jesus and the Apostles by using all the books found in the Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures.
Did the Holy Spirit make a mistake when those 73 books were canonized as the Old and New Testaments?
Did the Holy Spirit, after 1,500 years, say, “Thank God for the ‘reformers’; finally, they corrected My mistake!”
Did God the Father ask His Son Jesus why didn't He condemn the Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures, which was widely read by the citizens of Israel, when the Lord walked the Earth?
We don’t think so.
But Martin Luther and company (and those who continue to adhere to their theology today) thought they knew better by following the yeast of the Pharisees.
This tampering with Scripture — which is forbidden — is now reaching an outrageous crescendo. And the tampering deals specifically with writing someone right out of Her role in salvation history.
You know who She is.
It is the battle between the evil one and the Woman who will crush his head (Genesis 3:15 in the only Bible worth believing, the Latin Vulgate).
The Lord is shifting the wheat from the chaff.
In our next update, we will show how Mary and the Sword of Sorrow that pierced Her Heart has been rewritten in new Bibles to fit protest-ant theology and that Catholic Bibles are not faring so well either in the name of “ecumenism.”
We are well aware of the pope’s call for every Christian to engage in dialogue, but we will again state, as we are sure the Holy Father would agree, not at the expense of Marian dogma nor in tampering of the Scriptures!
If we did go along with this nonsense for the sake of ecumenism, we would be no better when we stand before God on Judgment Day than those who have rejected Mary’s Queenship — our protest-ant cousins.
Hmm, which is a Godly number that the Holy Spirit would use to symbolically indicate the number of books He has put His Stamp of Approval on in the Bible?
66
or
73.
You decide!
© 2003 Agnus Dei Presents!
